2021年1月26日 星期二

LEGO successful in cancelling “樂高兄弟LEKAO BROS” in trademark opposition proceeding

A Mr. Kao filed trademark application for “樂高兄弟LEKAO BROS” (“LEKAO BROS”) on May 8, 2019, designated for use in goods under class 25, including shirt, pants, sportswear, raincoat, socks, etc. Mr. Kao’s trademark application was granted on November 1, 2019. (Reg. No. 02019884, see below)

Lego Juris A/S (“LEGO”) filed opposition on January 16, 2020, citing violation of Article 30.1.10 of Trademark Act, which provides that a mark shall not be registered if such mark is similar with a senior mark that is applied for use in similar goods or service, which may cause confusion among the relevant public. More specifically, LEGO contended that LEKAO BROS may be confusingly similar with LEGO’s registered trademarks (Reg. No. 00307036 and 01773294, see below)

  

Taiwan’s IP Office (“TIPO”) ruled in favor of LEGO on December 31, 2020:

1.    LEGO alleged, and TIPO agreed, that through worldwide continuous use, LEGO’s asserted trademarks have already become well-known in products like clothing, hat, shoes, and boots. LEGO not only provided its worldwide trademark registrations, but also records of global revenue, advertising campaign, and market reports, which support the high distinctiveness and well-known status of LEGO’s opposing trademarks.

2.    As to similarity, TIPO noted that the opposed trademark consists of “LEKAO BROS” and the corresponding Chinese characters “樂高兄弟”. Since ”BROS” and “兄弟” refer to “brother”, which are ordinary words, TIPO was of the view that ordinary consumers would find “LEKAO” and “樂高” the most attractive portion of the contested trademark. Therefore, TIPO posited that the main distinctive portion of “樂高兄弟LEKAO BROS” are “LEKAO” and “樂高“, and determined that it is visually and verbally similar with LEGO’s aforesaid opposing trademarks.

3.      Turning to the similarity of the designated products, TIPO found LEGO’s opposing trademarks and “樂高兄弟LEKAO BROS” are applied for use in similar goods. For example, LEGO’s trademarks are also used in apparel, shoes, boots, and hats.  Therefore, both trademarks are used in clothing products that could keep warm or provide decorative feature. Accordingly, TIPO concluded that the designated products of “樂高兄弟LEKAO BROS” are relevant to or associated with those of LEGO’s opposing trademarks, and cancelled “樂高兄弟LEKAO BROS” in view of violation of Article 30.1.10 of Trademark Act.

 

Source: https://twtmsearch.tipo.gov.tw/OS0/OS0401_SCN3.jsp?issueNo=XpJ13RyT4M3l6RXBucG9yczBNNmtrRmxicVM5dz09&l6=zh_TW&isReadBulletinen_US=&isReadBulletinzh_TW=true


沒有留言:

張貼留言

Starbucks successful in invalidation action against trademark “星爸爸 Starpapa”

On November 28, 2024, Taiwan’s IP Office (“TIPO”) ruled in favor of global coffee giant, Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”), finding the di...