On April 12, 2024, the Appeals and Petitions
Committee of Ministry of Economic Affairs (“Committee”) affirmed the finding made
by Taiwan’s IP Office (“TIPO”) in the trademark opposition between “STEAM” and “&TEAM”,
concluding that registration of “&TEAM” for use in certain categories of the
services under class 41 should be canceled due to likelihood of confusion with
Valve’s “STEAM” trademarks (Reg. No. 01644559 and 02207353, see below).
The Committee affirmed TIPO’s determination
based on the following reasons:
1.
Article 30.1.10 of Trademark
Act provides that a mark shall not be registered if such a mark is: 1) identical
with or similar to another person’s registered trademark or earlier filed
trademark; and 2) to be applied for goods or services identical with or similar
to those for which the registered trademark is protected or the earlier filed
trademark is designated; and 3) hence there exists a likelihood of confusion on
relevant consumers.
2.
HYBE contended that the difference
of initial letters between “&TEAM” and “STEAM” renders the two trademarks
different from each other. The Committee disagreed. The difference created by the
“&” of “&TEAM” is too minor and thus is insufficient to make HYBE’s “&TEAM”
distinguishable from Valve’s “STEAM”.
3.
As to the designated use of product
and service, the Committee found Valve’s “STEAM” trademarks are used in
products and services under class 9 and 41, including gaming software, downloadable
gaming software, online gaming and entertainment service, and gaming and
entertainment service provided via wireless connection, organizing cultural or
sports activities, etc. These services, the Committee opined, are related to
the services designated by HYBE’s “&TEAM”, because both related to products
or services pertaining to computer software, entertainment, education, and
activities organization.
4.
While the Committee agreed that
both HYBE’s “&TEAM” and Valve’s “STEAM” are distinctive, there is no record
to support a finding that consumers are highly familiar with “&TEAM” and
could distinguish HYBE’s “&TEAM” from Valve’s “STEAM”. Rather, the evidence
of trademark use submitted by Valve shows that consumers are more familiar with
Valve’s “STEAM” than HYBE’s “&TEAM”.
In view of the above, considering the
similarity between HYBE’s “&TEAM” and Valve’s “STEAM”, the fact that both HYBE’s
“&TEAM” and Valve’s “STEAM” are used in services related to computer game
and entertainment activities, and consumers’ familiarity toward Valve’s “STEAM”,
the Committee opines registration of HYBE’s “&TEAM” is likely to cause
confusion with Valve’s “STEAM” among the relevant consumers. Therefore, TIPO’s
finding of violation of Article 30.1.10 is affirmed accordingly.
Source:
Committee’s determination: https://cloud.tipo.gov.tw/S282/SS0/SS0201_SCN3.jsp?approNo=G01100608&docDate=113/04/15&type=1&l6=zh_TW&isReadBulletinen_US=&isReadBulletinzh_TW=true
沒有留言:
張貼留言