Fashion giant Consolidated Artists B.V.
(“Consolidated Artists”), the owner of the registered “MANGO” trademark in
Taiwan, successfully cancelled “Mr. MANGO” in the opposition proceeding of
Taiwan’s Intellectual Property Office (“IPO”).
(The opposing trademark (TW Reg. No. 683050) (exemplified))
The opposed trademark, namely, “Mr. MANGO” (as shown below), was filed by a Mr. Zeng in June 19, 2018, and registered on February 16, 2019, designated to goods including scarf, necktie, and hats. Consolidated Artists filed opposition on May 10, 2019, citing violation of Article 30.1.10, 30.1.11, and 30.1.12 of Trademark Law. The IPO found the opposed trademark should be cancelled based on Article 30.1.11.
(Opposed Trademark Reg. No. 01970824)
Article
30.1.11 of Trademark Law reads: “A trademark shall not be registered in any of
the following:……being identical with or similar to another person’s well-known
trademark or mark, and hence there exists a likelihood of confusion on the
relevant public or a likelihood of dilution of the distinctiveness or
reputation of the said well-known trademark or mark”.
The
IPO found the opposed mark subject to Article 30.1.11 pursuant to the following
reasons:
First
of all, the opposing trademark “MANGO” is a well-known trademark, which has
been filed for registration in Taiwan since as early as 1994 (e.g., Reg. No.
683050), designated for goods such as clothing, perfume, glasses, jewels, and
purses (e.g., Reg. No. 683050, 814574, 1040217, 1047182, and 1292623). There is
sufficient evidence showing the opposing trademark has gained the status of
famous mark prior to the application date of the opposed trademark.
As
to similarity, IPO determined that while the opposed trademark consists of “Mr.
MANGO” and “芒果先生”, the word “MANGO”
would still be the main portion that catches the attention of ordinary
consumer, because both ”Mr.” and “先生” are words used to
refer to male. In other words, the most distinctive portions of the opposed
trademark and the opposing trademark are both “MANGO,” which may cause ordinary
consumers to misunderstand that the goods featuring the opposed trademark comes
from the opposing trademark. Hence, the opposed trademark is similar with the
opposing trademark.
Moreover,
the opposing trademark is distinctive as an arbitrary mark by using the word
“mango” (with ordinary meaning of mango tree or its fruit) in apparel and
accessories products. Through its continuous and worldwide use, the opposing
trademark is well-known and highly recognized among the relevant consumers in
the relevant markets. In contrast, there is no supporting document submitted by
Mr. Zeng demonstrating the actual use of the opposed trademark. Therefore, IPO
found the opposing trademark is more popular and famous than the opposed
trademark.
In
view of the above, the IPO ruled that the opposed trademark “Mr. MANGO” should
be cancelled based on Article 30.1.11 of Taiwan’s Trademark Law.
沒有留言:
張貼留言